Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I mean, be suspicious, that’s always good. But have proof before being certain of something you don’t have facts to back up.


>But have proof before being certain of something you don’t have facts to back up

When it comes to such things, it's better to assume bad intent.

Assuming corporate benevolence as the default is foolish.


This is a better point than the one I made


That’s what suspicion means.


That is why I said I'm suspicious, and did not make a claim that they are doing it. Thanks for your input.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: