Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | runningmike's commentslogin

There are a lot of similarities between IT companies that promise simple IT solutions with criminals and fraudsters that offer ‘Get-rich-quick’ schemes.

Understanding how LLMs work is challenging. But learning the core concepts is should be fun. Good news is that great open tutorials are created that give you a kickstart when working with LLMs.

Popularity is never a metric for security or quality….Always verify.

Verify what? I certainly don't have the capacity to thoroughly review my every dependency's source code in order to detect potentially hidden malware.

In this case more realistic advice would probably be to either rely on a more popular package to benefit from swarm intelligence, or creating your own implementation.


also scrutinize every dependency you introduce. I have seen sooooo many dependencies over the years where a library was brought in for one or two things which you can write yourself in 5 minutes (e.g. commons-lang to use null-safe string compare or contains only)

Sure but you basically need a different ecosystem to bring in a popular package and not expect to end up with these trivial libraries indirectly through some of the dependencies.

Said scrutinizing from my side consists of checking the number of downloads and age of the package, maybe at best a quick look at the GitHub.

Yes, I'm sure many dependencies aren't very necessary. However, in many projects I worked on (corporate) which were on the older Webpack/Babel/Jest stack, you can expect node_modules at over 1 GB. There this ship has sailed long ago.

But on the upside, most of those packages should be fairly popular. With pnpm's dependency cooldown and whitelisting of postinstall scripts, you are probably good.


>consists of checking the number of downloads and age of the package

Age can't be gamed, but number of downloads sure can.


I looked at number of downloads just like I am looking at number of amazon reviews :) tells you just about the same thing - nothing at all

Verify? Verify what?

Over a certain popularity it is. 56k downloads is nowhere near the threshold.

But... GitHub stars!

There is no such a thing as 'FOSS community' and FOSS people.

This blogs says a lot about the author...

But flagging this is submission is overkill imho.


Great to see another FOSS alternative for the defacto marmaid format!

I added this nice tool directly to my collection of great architecture tools. (https://nocomplexity.com/documents/arplaybook/software-archi...)


The guide on how to quickly identify AI-generated material is great. Link in the article.


> He was awarded substantial damages of £70,000 and was also awarded his costs.

I could do with £70,000 - I'm suing you for your comment of making me jealous of £70k.


The bad thing is: these kind of blogs are used for LLM trainings. Never trust AI for security advice without thinking and understanding what you do.

Is this a joke? It is called “private key” with a reason…


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: